Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  1. Home
  2. Newsroom
  3. Stats and Summaries
  4. Custody and Transfer Statistics

Custody and Transfer Statistics

Fiscal Year 2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025.

OFO Monthly Southwest Border Credible Fear Inadmissibles by Disposition

Disposition Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
Expedited Removal-Credible Fear (ERCF)1 917 825 - - - - - - - - - -
Notice To Appear (NTA)2 39,775 37,757 - - - - - - - - - -
Notice To Appear (NTA)-Person Released 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Notice To Appear (NTA)-Person Detained 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Visa Waiver Program (VWP)- Removal-Limited Review3 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Visa Waiver Program (VWP)- Refusal Limited Review3 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Stowaway-Limited Review3 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Total Credible Fear Inadmissibles 40,692 38,582 - - - - - - - - - -
Total Title 8 Inadmissibles 49,809 45,578 - - - - - - - - - -

Title 8 Inadmissibles

Field Office Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
El Paso 7,829 7,553 - - - - - - - - - -
Laredo 22,180 21,105 - - - - - - - - - -
San Diego 16,060 15,413 - - - - - - - - - -
Tucson 3,740 3,507 - - - - - - - - - -
Total 49,809 47,578 - - - - - - - - - -

OFO Monthly Southwest Border Credible Fear Inadmissibles by Program

Program Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP)- Initial returns 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Asylum Cooperative Agreement (ACA) Program - Expedited Removal - Credible Fear (ERCF) 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
ACA - Notice to Appear (NTA) 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Humanitarian Asylum Review Process (HARP) Program -Expedited Removal - Credible Fear (ERCF) 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
HARP - Notice to Appear (NTA) 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Total 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -

OFO Monthly Southwest Border Credible Fear by Transfer Destination

Destination Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
Federal/State/Local Facility 101 100 - - - - - - - - - -
ICE/ERO 1,280 1,203 - - - - - - - - - -
ICE/HSI 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
OFO 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Return to Foreign 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
USBP 363 332 - - - - - - - - - -
Total 1,744 1,635 - - - - - - - - - -

1 Includes subjects who indicated a desire to seek asylum or a fear of persecution in Office of Field Operations’ (OFO) custody at a port of entry. OFO refers all such claims to USCIS for a credible fear interview. Credible fear may be claimed at any time prior to removal.

2 This number reflects instances where OFO exercises its discretion and issues a Notice to Appear (NTA) to initiate removal proceedings before an immigration judge. This does not include NTAs issued at the discretion of other DHS components with authority to issue NTAs.

3 The term "limited review" refers to the process of an immigration judge considering claims of US citizenship, Lawful Permanent Residence, Asylum or Refugee status.

Field Operations - Southwest Border in Custody1

Detention Capacity Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
In Custody Capacity 902 902 - - - - - - - - - -
% 661 (73.28%)2 700(77.61%)2 - - - - - - - - - -

1 Represents an estimate of each cell's coded occupancy limit, as outlined in technical design standards when constructed, multiplied by the total number of cells for all ports of entry within each field office. This number does not account for the unique circumstances that may limit the occupancy of a given cell (e.g., high risk, nursing/pregnant, transgender, unaccompanied minor, etc.) nor does it reflect operational limitations that affect a port's capacity to detain. CBP’s capacity to detain individuals in its short-term facilities depends on many factors, including: demographics of the individual in custody; medical or other needs of individuals in custody; ability of ICE ERO (or, if an unaccompanied child, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) to transfer individuals out of CBP custody; and OFO's available resources to safely process and hold individuals.

2 Represents the average number of travelers in custody on a daily basis averaged over the 30-day period, at all Southwest Border Field Office locations. Travelers include inadmissible individuals, lawful permanent residents, asylees, refugees, and United States Citizens who are being detained to verify wants, warrants, criminal, administrative or other judicial process.

USBP Monthly Southwest Border Encounters by Processing Disposition

The processing disposition decision related to each apprehension is made on a case-by-case basis. The processing dispositions below are respresentative of the time data was aggregated. As dispositions are subject to change throughout the immigration process, the data does not necessarily reflect final dispositions or removals.

Processing Disposition Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
Notice to Appear/Own Recognizance (NTA-OR) 10,016 7,039 - - - - - - - - - -
Paroles 5 3 - - - - - - - - - -
Notice to Report (NTR) 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Expedited Removal (ER) 318 159 - - - - - - - - - -
Expedited Removal (ER) - per Interim Final Rule "Securing the Border"1 28,238 24,594 - - - - - - - - - -
Reinstatement of Prior Order of Removal 8,963 7,926 - - - - - - - - - -
Warrant of Arrest/Notice to Appear - (Detained) 7,087 5,262 - - - - - - - - - -
Voluntary Return 1,605 1,395 - - - - - - - - - -
MPP 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Other2 294 234 - - - - - - - - - -
Total Title 8 Apprehensions 56,526 46,612 - - - - - - - - - -

1 The Interim Final Rule "Securing the Border" went into effect on June 5, 2024. Individuals processed under this rule for expedited removal are currently reflected in the "Expedited Removal - per Interim Final Rule "Securing the Border"" row above, which is included within the "Expedited Removal (ER) - Total" row. Includes all paroles and is not limited to Parole + ATD

2 Processing dispositions may include subjects that do not yet have a final disposition at the time the data was collected or subjects processed under the visa waiver program, turned over to, paroled, etc.

USBP Monthly Southwest Border Apprehensions by Transfer Destination

Following processing, U.S. Border Patrol arranges transfer of individuals to the appropriate entity based on disposition and other factors such as criminal charges. The transfer destinations below are respresentative of the time data was aggregated. The data does not reflect subsequent transfer destinations after subjects leave Border Patrol custody and are subject to change if an individual returns to U.S. Border Patrol custody during the same event.

Transfer Destination Oct-23 Nov-23 Dec-23 Jan-24 Feb-24 Mar-24 Apr-24 May-24 Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24
Provisional Releases (OR, P, REL) 10,079 7,064 - - - - - - - - - -
Federal (ERO, ORR, Other)1 23,536 18,656 - - - - - - - - - -
Federal - Northern Triangle Repatriation Flights (ENV) 1,956 2,168 - - - - - - - - - -
Federal - Mexican Repatriation Flights (IRI/IFP) 634 582 - - - - - - - - - -
Transferred Port of Entry (Non-MPP) 18,590 14,909 - - - - - - - - - -
Transferred Port of Entry (MPP) 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (Other) 1,219 1,040 - - - - - - - - - -
Transferred BookOut/TOT-Other2 786 518 - - - - - - - - - -
Total Title 8 Transferred Out of Custody 56,520 44,937 - - - - - - - - - -

1 Manifested as turned over to other Federal agencies, to include Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Health and Human Services, U.S. Marshals, etc.

2 Includes subjects that have not been transferred out of USBP custody at the time the data was collected or subjects manifested as transferred to hospital, paroled, etc.

USBP Average Daily Subjects In Custody by Southwest Border Sector

U.S. Border Patrol facilities, such as stations and central processing centers, provide short-term holding capacity for the processing and transfer of individuals encountered by agents. Maximum facility capacity along the southwest border is approximately 18,000 which assumes a homogenous population and full operating status at all facilities. Actual capacity fluctuates constantly based on characteristics of in-custody population, to include demographics, gender, criminality, etc.

Sector Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
Big Bend 3 4 - - - - - - - - - -
Del Rio 398 445 - - - - - - - - - -
El Centro 161 68 - - - - - - - - - -
El Paso 902 1,239 - - - - - - - - - -
Laredo 635 469 - - - - - - - - - -
Rio Grande 506 427 - - - - - - - - - -
San Diego 1,202 1,239 - - - - - - - - - -
Tucson 600 469 - - - - - - - - - -
Yuma 486 424 - - - - - - - - - -
Total 4,893 4,894 - - - - - - - - - -

USBP Southwest Border SPP Program Apprehensions Since Program Inception through November 2024

Apprehension data includes deportable migrants only.

Data Source: EID through BPERT (Unofficial) as of 12/04/2024 10:42:39 AM

SPP Program SPP Program Type Inception Date Apprehensions Since Inception
MPP NTA Program 1/28/2019 82,230
ENV Removal Modality 8/5/2019 104,555
PACR ER Program 10/7/2019 3,080
HARP ER Program 10/28/2019 691
ACA_GUAT ER Program 11/19/2019 1,492
IRI/IFP Removal Modality 12/19/2019 35,996

Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP)

The Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) is an exercise of the Department of Homeland Security’s express statutory authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to return certain applicants for admission, or those who enter illegally between the ports of entry, who are subject to removal proceedings under INA Section 240 Removal Proceedings to Mexico pending removal proceedings.
 

Prompt Asylum Claim Review (PACR)

The Prompt Asylum Claim Review (PACR) pathway was developed by U.S. Border Patrol (USBP), in coordination with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) to promptly address credible fear claims of amenable individuals.
 

Asylum Cooperative Agreement (ACA)

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in coordination with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement Removal Operations (ERO), and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), have executed Asylum Cooperative Agreements (ACAs) to facilitate the transfer of individuals to a third country where they will have access to full and fair procedures for determining their protection claims, based on the ACAs.
 

Humanitarian Asylum Review Process (HARP)

The Humanitarian Asylum Review Process (HARP), was developed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in coordination with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) to promptly address credible fear claims of amenable Mexican nationals.
 

Electronic Nationality Verification

Under the Electronic Nationality Verification (ENV) program U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in coordination with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), remove eligible noncitizens with a final order of removal to their native countries.
 

Interior Repatriation Initiative (IRI)

Under the Interior Repatriation Initiative (IRI), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in coordination with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement Removal Operations (ERO) and the Mexican Ministry of the Interior, remove eligible noncitizens from Mexico to the interior of Mexico.

USBP’s methodology for reporting apprehensions attributes encounters to various enforcement zones throughout the sectors. Due to a unique alignment of enforcement zones in the state of New Hampshire, all apprehensions made in the state would be attributed to stations in Vermont using this methodology. As New Hampshire is the only state that this methodology impacts in such a way, CBP is releasing the number of encounters that took place within the state’s boundaries on the below table. Data for New Hampshire reflected on the Nationwide Encounter page’s Encounters by State table only includes OFO encounters.

New Hampshire FY21 - FY24 USBP Apprehensions by Month

Fiscal Year 2021

Region Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21
Swanton 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0
Houlton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0

Fiscal Year 2022

Region Oct-22 Nov-22 Dec-22 Jan-22 Feb-22 Mar-22 Apr-22 May-22 Jun-22 Jul-22 Aug-22 Sep-22
Swanton 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Houlton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

Fiscal Year 2023

Region Oct-23 Nov-23 Dec-23 Jan-23 Feb-23 Mar-23 Apr-23 May-23 Jun-23 Jul-23 Aug-23 Sep-23
Swanton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 1 3 6
Houlton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 1 3 6

Fiscal Year 2024

Region Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-24 Feb-24 Mar-24 Apr-24 May-24 Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24
Swanton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3
Houlton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3

Fiscal Year 2025

Region Oct-25 Nov-25 Dec-25 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
Swanton 1 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Houlton 0 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Total 1 0 - - - - - - - - - -

Related Resources

Last Modified: Dec 19, 2024